Home/Services/Legal Opinion
05

A first-draft legal opinion — structured, reasoned, and signed under your name.

You frame the question and the facts. We prepare a structured opinion with issue identification, statutory and case-law anchors, counter-arguments, and a reasoned conclusion. A qualified advocate reviews every opinion before delivery.

OPINION · PREVIEW72-hr SLA

Director’s liability for disclosure breach in a cross-border share sale — Delaware and Singapore parallel analysis

Structure
Facts · Issues · Analysis · Counter · Conclusion
Jurisdictions
Delaware & Singapore
Authorities
18 cited, parallel
Word count
4,000 (typical)
US$850–1,400Per opinion
72–79%Typical saving
72 hrStandard turn
ParallelCross-jurisdiction on one brief
— How the opinion is built

A supervised first draft, not a finished advisory.

01

You set the facts.

Load the factual matrix, the documents in play, and the specific questions you want answered. One brief, one engagement.

02

AI builds the skeleton.

Issues framed, statutory anchors identified, authorities grouped by proposition, and competing positions flagged for analysis.

03

A locally-qualified lawyer reviews it.

A lawyer licensed in the jurisdiction of your matter tests each authority, strengthens the reasoning, and highlights with [VERIFY] markers the points that warrant your independent judgement.

04

You sign and issue.

You review the draft, adjust the conclusion, and sign the final opinion. The letter goes out on your firm’s letterhead.

— What you receive

Structured like an opinion. Drafted like a brief.

LEGAL OPINION · DRAFT FOR SUPERVISING COUNSEL Ref. LD-2026-0521
To
Instructing Partner
Re
Director liability — s.402B Companies Act (SG) / §102(b)(7) DGCL parallel
Date
22 April 2026
Executive summary

On the facts submitted, the director is likely exposed under Singapore law but benefits from substantial exculpation under Delaware law by reason of the charter waiver. The divergence turns on the statutory construction of the disclosure duty. [VERIFY]

Issues
  1. Whether the non-disclosure constitutes a breach of statutory duty.
  2. Whether the charter exculpation clause is effective against such a breach.
  3. Whether the plaintiff has standing in both forums.
Counter-arguments considered
  • Ratification by informed shareholders — not pleaded on the facts.
  • Limitation — outer long-stop reached in Delaware but not Singapore. [VERIFY]
  • + 3 further counter-positions addressed in full analysis

Every opinion includes

  • Executive summary your client can read first; reasoning they can interrogate second.
  • Structured issues, analysis, counter-argument, conclusion sections.
  • Full authority table with verifiable citations and signal annotations.
  • Parallel-jurisdiction analysis where you’ve asked for it — one brief, two legal systems.
  • Clean .docx, ready to issue on your firm’s letterhead.
Important. The deliverable is a first draft addressed to you, the supervising lawyer. It is not a final opinion until you review, revise, and sign it. We do not issue opinions directly to your client.
— Is this the right fit?

We draft opinions for lawyers who issue them.

Ideal for

  • Transactional partners asked for a quick reasoned view on a novel point.
  • Disputes counsel scoping a matter before fee estimating.
  • Cross-border M&A where you need parallel analysis in two jurisdictions.
  • In-house legal teams escalating to board with a reasoned recommendation.

Not the right fit

  • Formal tax opinions requiring a licensed tax practitioner in jurisdiction.
  • Reliance opinions addressed to third parties.
  • Opinions requiring in-person diligence or witness examination.

Brief your first opinion.

Professional tier includes three opinions a month and unlimited research memos.